Skip to main content

ChatGPT vs. DeepL for Translations

Learn their strengths, limitations, and how Elovate combines both for maximum flexibility and quality

Updated over a week ago

ChatGPT vs. DeepL for translations

Traditional translation providers such as DeepL have earned a strong reputation in the market, but ChatGPT offers a new approach. The main difference lies in their underlying logic:

  • DeepL relies on algorithms trained on large datasets to recognize patterns and contexts.

  • ChatGPT uses prompt-based generation, producing translations through conversational AI logic.


Advantages of using ChatGPT for translations

1. Cost efficiency

ChatGPT can be significantly more affordable than DeepL, making it an attractive choice for smaller businesses or individuals with limited budgets.

2. Strong contextual understanding

Thanks to its training on diverse text types and styles, ChatGPT delivers fluid, natural-sounding translations—especially in complex sentences or conversational text.

3. Adaptability

With ChatGPT, translations can be tailored to your brand’s tone and style by providing clear, customized prompts. This makes it easy to produce more personalized results.


Disadvantages of using ChatGPT for translations

1. Accuracy and precision

DeepL is renowned for its high accuracy, especially with complex or technical documents. ChatGPT can sometimes produce varying results for the same input, which may lead to inconsistencies.

2. Consistency

DeepL generally offers more consistent translations across long documents and complex sentence structures. ChatGPT’s output can shift in style or tone depending on the prompt or context.

3. Language coverage depth

While ChatGPT supports a wide range of languages, DeepL often provides deeper and more refined support for certain less common languages.

4. Handling complex text structures

DeepL tends to perform better with specialized formats, such as legal documents or technical specifications. ChatGPT may occasionally misinterpret structured content.

5. Preprocessing and postprocessing features

DeepL offers more built-in tools for cleaning up or optimizing translations before and after processing. ChatGPT’s features in this area are less extensive.


Balancing consistency and cost

Both ChatGPT and DeepL have strengths and limitations.

  • Choose ChatGPT when you need flexibility, cost savings, or prompt-driven customization.

  • Choose DeepL when accuracy, technical consistency, or document structure fidelity is your top priority.


How Elovate helps

Elovate supports both ChatGPT and DeepL for translations. Through its Translation Jobs, Glossaries, and Rule Builder, Elovate adds extra flexibility, allowing you to:

  • Apply brand-specific terminology

  • Automate repetitive translation tasks

  • Choose between AI-assisted, fully automated, or manual workflows

This means you can maximize the strengths of each tool—while working within a single, integrated translation process.

Did this answer your question?